Justia Lawyer Rating
10 Best, Attorney Client Satisfaction Badge from the American Institute of Criminal Law Attorneys
Top 100 Trial Lawyers Badge from The National Trial Lawyers
Top 100 Badge from America's Top 100 Criminal Defense Attorneys
NADC
Avoo Rating, 10.0 Scott Grabel
Top 10, Attorney and Practice Magazine's, Criminal Defense Law Firm

Michigan Parole Decisions and Risk Assessment

Michigan Parole Decisions and Risk Assessment 

Risk assessments play a central role in parole decisions in Michigan. In practical terms, Michigan parole decisions and risk assessments are intertwined, reflecting how data-driven tools inform outcomes. The Parole Board does not make decisions based solely on instinct; it relies on structured tools, statutory authority, and professional judgment to evaluate whether a prisoner presents an unreasonable risk to the community. These assessments are designed to strike a balance between public safety and the possibility of rehabilitation. Understanding how the Board applies risk assessments can help prisoners and families better prepare for hearings.

If you need guidance on appeals or post-conviction strategy related to parole outcomes, a Michigan appellate attorney can explain your options and help align your parole strategy with potential appellate remedies.

Michigan Parole Laws and Administrative Guidelines

The Michigan Parole Board’s authority comes from MCL 791.233e and MCL 791.234, which establish that parole is a discretionary privilege. Administrative Rule 791.7716 supplements these statutes by outlining the parole guidelines, which include scoring factors for risk and rehabilitation. Together, these legal provisions provide the framework for evaluating each prisoner’s likelihood of success if released.

Understanding the Michigan Parole Guidelines Score

The parole guidelines score is the primary risk assessment tool used by the Board. It measures both static and dynamic factors, including:

  • Criminal history: Prior felonies, prior incarcerations, and severity of past offenses.
  • Institutional behavior: Misconduct tickets, clean conduct, and program participation.
  • Age at sentencing and age at eligibility: Statistically, younger offenders are considered to present a higher risk.
  • Substance abuse history: Prior issues with drugs or alcohol and treatment outcomes.
  • Program completion: Education, therapy, and vocational achievements.

The resulting score places the prisoner in one of three categories: high probability of parole, average probability, or low probability. Although the score is influential, the Board is not bound by it and may depart when circumstances justify.

Static vs. Dynamic Risk Factors in Michigan Parole Decisions

Risk assessments weigh both static and dynamic factors:

  • Static factors: These are unchangeable characteristics, such as prior convictions, criminal history, and age at the time of the first offense. They establish a baseline risk.
  • Dynamic factors: These can be influenced by the prisoner’s conduct, such as program completion, institutional behavior, and support networks.

While static factors cannot be changed, strong performance in dynamic factors can offset risk and persuade the Board that genuine rehabilitation has occurred.

Psychological and Substance Abuse Evaluations in Parole Hearings

In addition to the parole guidelines, the Board often relies on psychological evaluations and substance abuse assessments. These professional evaluations provide insight into whether the prisoner has addressed underlying behavioral or addiction issues. Favorable evaluations can strengthen a case for parole, while negative ones can raise red flags.

Victim and Prosecutor Input in Michigan Parole Risk Assessments

Victim input, authorized by the Crime Victim’s Rights Act (MCL 780.751 et seq.), is a decisive factor in risk assessments. Victims may testify to ongoing trauma or safety concerns, which can influence the Board’s perception of risk. Prosecutors may also submit objections, particularly in cases involving violence, to highlight community safety concerns. While these inputs are not determinative, they can heavily influence the final decision.

How Risk Assessments Shape Michigan Parole Board Decisions

The Board considers the risk assessment as a guide, not a mandate. A high probability score does not guarantee parole, and a low score does not guarantee denial. Instead, the Board evaluates whether the prisoner’s rehabilitation and parole plan outweigh any concerns. Risk assessments are most effective when paired with credible evidence of changes, such as strong support networks, verified housing, and documented sobriety.

Common Mistakes in Addressing Michigan Parole Risk Factors

Prisoners often make mistakes that undermine their risk profile:

  • Ignoring negative evaluations instead of addressing them.
  • Assuming a high guidelines score guarantees release.
  • Failing to demonstrate concrete steps to reduce dynamic risk factors.
  • Presenting vague or unrealistic parole plans.

Avoiding these mistakes requires preparation and an honest evaluation of strengths and weaknesses.

Why Hiring a Michigan Parole Lawyer Matters

Experienced attorneys know how to interpret and respond to risk assessments. At Grabel & Associates, we:

  • Review parole guidelines scores for accuracy.
  • Help clients demonstrate improvements in dynamic risk factors.
  •  Work with experts to obtain strong psychological and substance abuse evaluations.
  • Prepare clients to address risk concerns directly during interviews.

With over 25 years of experience, we understand how the Board assesses risk and how to construct a case that emphasizes rehabilitation over danger.

Contact a Michigan Parole and Appellate Attorney

Risk assessments play a crucial role in parole decisions in the state of Michigan. They provide structure to the process, but they do not dictate the outcome. By addressing both static and dynamic factors, securing positive evaluations, and preparing a strong parole plan, prisoners can demonstrate to the Board that their risk has been mitigated. With proper guidance, rehabilitation can outweigh risk, leading to a greater chance of parole. Grabel & Associates is committed to helping clients navigate this process and present the strongest case for release.

Appealing a conviction is never easy. To have any chance, you need a knowledgeable, skilled, and seasoned team of attorneys. That’s why you need us. Contact us online or call our 24/7 defense hotline at 1-800-342-7896.

Client Reviews

★★★★★
If you are reading these reviews you are about to make a decision that will have a large impact on the rest of your life. I choose Grabel and Associates to represent me in my case and I could not have been more satisfied with the level of professionalism and dedication to their clients. I had the opportunity to meet and work with multiple lawyers in the practice all of which showcased a vast knowledge and understanding of the inner workings of the legal system. When you choose Scott Grabel to represent you will open yourself up to all of his resources. Depending on your case Grabel knows experts in all fields. I worked with polygraph examiners, investigators, and forensics experts. Grabel and Associates will defend without prejudice of innocence or guilt. Scott Grabel was able to lead me through every step of the process with great communication the whole way. I would recommend Scott Grabel and Associates to my friends, family and anyone who is in need of representation. B. A.
★★★★★
Best attorney in state of Michigan. Caring and a true friend. Scott was with us every step of the way. He fought for a great injustice for our son and was able to provide an outcome that gave his life back. L. A.
★★★★★
Scott and his firm did an awesome job representing a family member of mine, I would highly recommend him and his firm! They were extremely reliable, trustworthy and very informative and did a great job with the case. I couldn't be happier with the results that we received, I can't speak highly enough about the great job he did. If you are thinking about using his firm, I would highly recommend, I would definitely use his firm again if needed, he is an a great attorney with a great firm, you won't be disappointed! M. F.