Justia Lawyer Rating
10 Best, Attorney Client Satisfaction Badge from the American Institute of Criminal Law Attorneys
Top 100 Trial Lawyers Badge from The National Trial Lawyers
Top 100 Badge from America's Top 100 Criminal Defense Attorneys
NADC
Avoo Rating, 10.0 Scott Grabel
Top 10, Attorney and Practice Magazine's, Criminal Defense Law Firm

Michigan Parole for Juveniles

Michigan Parole for Juveniles

Juvenile offenders facing parole in Michigan represent one of the most rapidly evolving areas of criminal law. In the past, many juveniles were sentenced to mandatory life without parole (LWOP) for serious offenses such as homicide. However, landmark U.S. Supreme Court decisions, including Miller v. Alabama (2012) and Montgomery v. Louisiana (2016), dramatically changed the legal landscape. These rulings established that mandatory LWOP for juveniles is unconstitutional and that states must provide meaningful opportunities for release based on demonstrated rehabilitation. 

Michigan has since undertaken widespread resentencing of juvenile lifers, and the Parole Board now plays a pivotal role in determining whether these individuals can safely reintegrate into society. Recent reforms and advocacy have centered on the issue of Michigan parole for juveniles, highlighting both legal challenges and the importance of ensuring fair parole hearings.

When navigating complex appeals related to juvenile lifer resentencing or parole, working with an experienced Michigan appellate attorney can help challenge procedural errors, argue constitutional claims, and advocate for second chances under evolving state and federal legal standards.

U.S. Supreme Court Decisions Reshaping Juvenile Sentencing

The Supreme Court decisions that reshaped juvenile sentencing include:

  • Miller v. Alabama (2012): Held that mandatory life without parole sentences for juveniles violate the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. Judges must consider youth-related factors before imposing life sentences.
  • Montgomery v. Louisiana (2016): Made *Miller* retroactive, requiring states to provide resentencing or parole opportunities for juveniles previously sentenced to LWOP.

These rulings are grounded in the principle that children are constitutionally different from adults for sentencing purposes, less culpable, more capable of change, and deserving of individualized consideration.

Michigan’s Response to Juvenile Life Without Parole (LWOP)

Michigan had one of the highest populations of juvenile lifers in the nation. Following Miller and Montgomery, state courts began resentencing hundreds of individuals. Many were resentenced to terms of years or life with parole eligibility. Under MCL 769.25a, prosecutors may still seek life without parole in certain instances, but courts are required to hold hearings and consider youth-related mitigating factors. As a result, the Parole Board is now reviewing an increasing number of parole-eligible juvenile lifers.

Parole Eligibility for Juvenile Offenders in Michigan

For juveniles resentenced to life with parole eligibility or lengthy terms, parole eligibility generally arises after 25 to 40 years, depending on the resentencing order. The Parole Board evaluates juvenile offenders under the same statutory framework, MCL 791.233e and MCL 791.234, but with heightened consideration of youth factors, rehabilitation, and maturity gained over the course of decades of incarceration.

Key Factors in Michigan Juvenile Parole Hearings

The Board considers traditional parole factorssuch as institutional conduct, rehabilitation programs, evaluations, and parole plansbut also looks closely at youth-specific issues, including:

  • Evidence of brain development and maturity since the offense.
  • Demonstrated remorse and accountability.
  • Educational and vocational achievements earned while incarcerated.
  • Support systems are prepared to assist upon release.
  • Expert testimony on adolescent development and capacity for change.

Because juveniles are considered more capable of rehabilitation, strong evidence of growth carries significant weight.

Legal Challenges in Michigan Juvenile Parole Cases

Despite legal reforms, juvenile parole cases continue to be challenging. Many victims and prosecutors strongly oppose release, arguing that the seriousness of the original offense justifies continued incarceration. The Parole Board must balance these concerns with constitutional requirements for meaningful parole opportunities. Prisoners must therefore present overwhelming evidence of transformation to overcome resistance.

Best Practices for Preparing Juvenile Parole Applications

Juvenile parole cases demand meticulous preparation. Best practices include:

  • Documenting decades of positive institutional conduct.
  • Assembling educational and vocational records.
  • Submit psychological evaluations showing maturity and rehabilitation.
  • Developing robust parole plans with housing, employment, and treatment.
  • Preparing personal statements that acknowledge harm and highlight growth.

At Grabel & Associates, we help clients organize this evidence into comprehensive parole packages.

Why Legal Counsel Matters in Michigan Juvenile Parole Hearings

Because juvenile parole cases are both legally complex and emotionally charged, the presence of legal counsel is essential. At Grabel & Associates, we:

  • Assist clients in gathering and organizing decades of rehabilitation evidence.
  • Prepare clients for interviews where accountability and maturity will be closely scrutinized.
  • Coordinate expert testimony on adolescent development and rehabilitation.
  • Advocate persuasively before the Board, striking a balance between victim concerns and constitutional mandates.

Our 25 years of experience ensure that juvenile lifers seeking parole have every possible advantage.

Contact a Michigan Appellate Attorney for Juvenile Parole Appeals

Parole for juvenile offenders in Michigan reflects the evolving understanding that children are different from adults. Although many juvenile lifers now have opportunities for release, success depends on presenting extraordinary evidence of rehabilitation, maturity, and readiness to reintegrate. At Grabel & Associates, we are committed to ensuring that every juvenile parole case is prepared with the care, strategy, and advocacy needed to meet this high standard.

Appealing a conviction is never easy. To have any chance, you need a knowledgeable, skilled, and seasoned team of attorneys. That’s why you need us. Contact us online or call our 24/7 defense hotline at 1-800-342-7896.

Client Reviews

★★★★★
If you are reading these reviews you are about to make a decision that will have a large impact on the rest of your life. I choose Grabel and Associates to represent me in my case and I could not have been more satisfied with the level of professionalism and dedication to their clients. I had the opportunity to meet and work with multiple lawyers in the practice all of which showcased a vast knowledge and understanding of the inner workings of the legal system. When you choose Scott Grabel to represent you will open yourself up to all of his resources. Depending on your case Grabel knows experts in all fields. I worked with polygraph examiners, investigators, and forensics experts. Grabel and Associates will defend without prejudice of innocence or guilt. Scott Grabel was able to lead me through every step of the process with great communication the whole way. I would recommend Scott Grabel and Associates to my friends, family and anyone who is in need of representation. B. A.
★★★★★
Best attorney in state of Michigan. Caring and a true friend. Scott was with us every step of the way. He fought for a great injustice for our son and was able to provide an outcome that gave his life back. L. A.
★★★★★
Scott and his firm did an awesome job representing a family member of mine, I would highly recommend him and his firm! They were extremely reliable, trustworthy and very informative and did a great job with the case. I couldn't be happier with the results that we received, I can't speak highly enough about the great job he did. If you are thinking about using his firm, I would highly recommend, I would definitely use his firm again if needed, he is an a great attorney with a great firm, you won't be disappointed! M. F.